E O S
Posted: October 16th, 2008 | Author: jennihsurf | Filed under: Photography | Tags: canon 40d, canon 50d | 5 Comments »I officially dont own a dSLR anymore. I gave mine away to my brother. He needs one more than i do at the moment.
So now i have the time to think of my next model. Which definately have to be an upgrade.
***
The BIG question now is… to take 40D or the 50D

The EOS 40D becomes the sixth Canon ‘prosumer’ digital SLR, a line which started back in 2000 with the EOS D30, and how far we’ve come. It’s been eighteen months since the EOS 30D and although on the surface the 40D looks like a fairly subtle upgrade there’s a lot that makes this an even better camera. Of course we expect a step up in megapixels, and so the 40D comes with a ten million pixel CMOS sensor with the same sort of dust reduction as the EOS 400D, an ultrasonic platform which shakes the low pass filter. Other improvements bring the EOS 40D closer into line with the EOS-1D series, these include a move to the same page-by-page menu system, both RAW and sRAW (2.5 MP), 14-bit A/D converter and 14-bit RAW, cross-type AF points for F5.6 or faster lenses, a larger and brighter viewfinder, interchangeable focusing screens, a larger LCD monitor (3.0″) and faster continuous shooting (6.5 fps).

Almost exactly a year after the arrival of the EOS 40D, Canon has announced the 50D, which we’re assured will be a sister-model, rather than a replacement. Recent history has seen Canon release new models every 18 months-or-so but it’s been a busy year with newcomers such as the Nikon D300 getting a lot of attention in the 40D’s keen amateur/professional segment. The 50D is essentially a 40D body wrapped around a newly-developed 15 megapixel sensor that finally rectifies the situation in which Canon’s x0D range trailed the company’s entry-level line, in pixel terms. Canon is claiming that the new sensor’s design (new manufacturing processes, redesigned photo diodes and micro lenses) mean that despite the higher resolution the noise is actually lower than the 40D, something we’ll obviously be putting to the test when we get our hands on a production model.
The other big change is the inclusion of a new, high-resolution LCD screen. 920,000 dots mean that it can convey 640 x 480 RGB pixels, making it effectively a VGA standard monitor. Three anti-reflection layers built into the screen do their best to keep it useable in bright conditions, too.
*
I’ve tried both. Obviously 50D is ….. like a poison. Once you touch it.. you just keep dreaming about it. Thinking about it. Wanting it.
And although 40D is not as bad, but… still.. i rather take 50D since the difference btwn the two models is not that much.
Phew..
$.$ Money Money where art thouuuuu
***
Kinda lazy to blog about my experience with 50D as my head is heavy with something else right now.
buargh.
-J
























consider the 5D mark I for the same price point. The review screen is smaller, but the full frame, and the skin tone are really really nice.
50D is better in terms of noise control at High ISO. Other than that it is almost the same as 40D (which is cheaper)…
Can’t wait for you to blog bout 50D :))
nikon d300. hands down.
i’m gettin canon oso. dunno which yet.. *hee*